It has been a repeated mistake of apologists to approach unbelievers as though their interpretation of certain areas of reality (e.g., 'nature') were quite intelligible in terms of their professed philosophy (regarding reality, knowledge, and ethics) and acceptable as far as it goes, simple needing to be supplemented with some propositions about the 'supernatural.' According to Van Til, the apologist's focus should not be restricted to this 'added' dimension, but rather should encompass the entire range of human knowledge.

Contact:

....